![]() ![]() The colors of Bitwig can make some producers feel more creative. So for producers who like everything to be visible at the same time for quick choices and changes, Bitwig is a great choice.ĭespite looking sleeker and more professional, Ableton’s interface is less inviting. Most of the functionalities are easily accessible, making your workflow faster.Īnother advantage of using Bitwig is that it is optimized for touch screens and can support three separate screens simultaneously. Having said that, its layout also makes it more intuitive and easier to use. The interfaces have some similarities, with Bitwig’s coming across as less sleek. Workflow and Designīitwig was created by a former Ableton employee, and you can see the resemblance. With this many variations, you can easily create polyphonic synthesizers, audio effects, and note sequencers. It’s called The Grid, and it’s an instrument with 186 interchangeable modules. This DAW also has one of the best sound design tools available today. Bitwig has worked with many producers and sound designers to create a varied collection of samples, loops, and instruments. ![]() But where this program lacks in quantity, it makes up for it in quality. Seeing as it’s a relatively recent DAW on the market, this isn’t a surprise. So you’ll need to use some extra creativity to make them sound more exciting.īitwig’s library is much smaller than Ableton’s. If you have external libraries from the likes of Kontakt or Arturia, you’ll find Ableton’s versions quite digital and less-realistic sounding. However, the quality of the instruments isn’t the best. It has a collection that other DAWs seem to find hard to match. This is one reason why its CPU usage is more intense than Bitwig’s. When you sign up for Ableton Live’s most detailed version, Suite 11, you get a vast library with over 70GB of samples, loops, and instruments. While both programs take up different levels of processing power, they also vary in their features. You can see that there are several pros and cons in terms of CPU for both Bitwig and Ableton, so let’s take a look into some more features.Ībleton Live What Other Differences Exist Between Ableton and Bitwig? So, if there is a crash, it will be contained to the plugin itself rather than crashing the whole program. This means that they each run in separate environments. On the Bitwig side, the effects may be less efficient, but they include a plugin sandboxing system. They can give you lots of control over multiple tracks without overworking your computer. However, this shows why many producers prefer Ableton: it has many great instruments and plugins that Bitwig lacks.ĭespite taking up more processing space, Ableton has effects that are very CPU efficient. This is because it doesn’t put as much of a strain on your processing unit due to its more basic features. In terms of overall CPU usage, Bitwig is better than Ableton. Remember, we’re trying to be as objective as possible this time.6 Conclusion Which is best for the CPU? Bitwig or Ableton We also decided to run each EQ in a flat state to avoid introducing any colour or bias into the results. We also used a stock EQ plugin from each DAW: Ableton Live’s EQ Eight, FL Studio’s Fruity Parametric EQ 2, and Logic’s Channel EQ. ![]() We employed FabFilter Pro-Q 2 and Waves F6. This time we’ll be utilizing EQ plugins rather than compression. Let’s get our white lab coats out of the closet, fire up the Bunsen burners, and head back into the lab for round two of our tests. We read them all and have taken on some of the ideas for our second round of tests. Readers helpfully made a number of suggestions on how we could improve our experiment. While there was a visual aspect to it, the subjective listening portion may have been a little too open-ended. We wanted to hear how the sound would be affected in a real world-type test. Perhaps it was the subjective nature of the experiment. Despite the conclusion, it seems that a number of you still feel that DAWs can sound different. The article generated a lot of discussions online, which we followed closely. What we found was that despite a few, small differences here and there, the overall result was that there is no real difference. We loaded the same samples into three popular DAWs-Ableton Live, FL Studio Pro, and Logic Pro X-and compared the sound when run through a number of different compressors, both third party and native. Do DAWs indeed have their own, unique sound? Would the same song sound different depending on the DAW used? In part one of this series, we hoped to answer these questions. In part two of our series, we continue to examine whether there are discernible differences in the sound of three popular DAWs, Ableton Live, FL Studio 20, and Logic Pro X. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |